Curse

*lemming* · Nov 21, 2010, 11:06 PM // 23:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by drkn

Vast pool of possibilities and builds that are on par with each other - A may win with B, be equal to C and die to D, circle round, to put it simply. General usefulness of every class and role. General usefulness of at least 80% of skills when compared to others. Not being forced to stick to a stagnant meta-ways in order to achieve something. Not letting one class to be used more often with someone else's main weapon than that class. Being able to proactively response to constantly changing 'meta' not because the devs meddle in skills, but because the game lets you run different equal and/or counter things by default, which naturally leads to player-made evolution of the meta. [added] Moreso, in state of balance, players are rewarded by their proactivity and play skill rather than taking a build and running it (creative and wise build making + general play skill > being good at BBway, for an example).
If 'balance' means something else for 'pr0 elitist PvPers of GW', enlighten us.

Incorrect points in bold.

MisterB · Nov 21, 2010, 11:23 PM // 23:23

Can someone translate the first post? I don't speak gibberish. It looks like 4 different suggestions of some sort in one thread, and the title doesn't describe any of them.

MithranArkanere · Nov 22, 2010, 03:03 AM // 03:03

The only things that would make PvP lively again are random team formation for all PvP modes excepting GvG, which would remain for teams only.
And increased rewards that count not only each win, but for individual actions, like kills, support, assists, synergy, captures, etc... so even if you end up with a team that sucks, you'll get something if you are good enough.

That means that there would be a 'free to join' mode and a 'team' tournament mode for each PvP mode exceting GvG, which would remain 'team-only'.

If you want a quick HA, you go to the outpost and enter a random team.
If you want more rewards and higher end challenges, you enter tournament HA with a team.

And since parties would be completely random outside tournaments, rewards would be changed to reward each match separately, instead the annoying streaks that only encourage syncing.

That would ensure more people in PvP. Not THAT many more people, but more people that there is now.

Shayne Hawke · Nov 22, 2010, 03:16 AM // 03:16

There are a few suggestions put forth here that are aimed at different aspects of PvP. Since I don't really feel like we can have a decent discussion about all of those at once, I'm going to cite rule five here:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cebe

5. Post One Idea Per Thread

Do not post "A Few Ideas" threads. If you have more than one idea ---first double check with the search button and the index thread to make sure they're fresh suggestions, and create a separate thread for each one with a relevant title.

Closed.